Jason's Reviews > Cloud Atlas
Cloud Atlas
by
by
At the Museum of Science in Boston, there is an exhibit just outside the doors of the Planetarium that demonstrates—through a series of adjacent panels—the scale of the Earth in relation to the universe at large. The first panel shows the Earth’s location in the Solar System (as a microscopic dot, mind you), which is followed by a second panel showing the Solar System’s location in the Milky Way (also microscopic). The third panel is of the galaxy’s location in its Supercluster or whateverthefuck it’s called, and so forth and so on, concluding with a final panel depicting the entire observable universe. Reading Cloud Atlas is like zooming out from a point on the Earth to the edge of the universe and then back in again, as represented by those aforementioned panels. Do we need a visual aid?
The middle chapter, while the most difficult to read, is easily my favorite. In Sloosha’s Crossin’ an’ Ev’rythin’ After, humanity’s perpetual quest for domination provides the very spark needed to create and sustain civilization. However, this quest is a double-edged sword that becomes its own downfall, since domination is a self-defeating goal, and it is this downfall that ultimately causes civilization to collapse. But despite its bleak forecasts, Cloud Atlas inspires a glimmer of hope for our future, for as insignificant as one person may be, as much as one fathoms his life to have no impact greater than that of a single drop in a limitless ocean, the question is posed: “Yet what is any ocean but a multitude of drops?”
The Milky Way’s Galactic Center
© 2009 Serge Brunier, The Sky of the Earth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzYHWI...This novel, of course, has little to do with the cosmos, but the analogy is fitting for describing the vastness of its scope. It is a hugely ambitious novel connecting characters through space and time, from Adam Ewing’s mid-nineteenth century voyage from the Chatham Islands to Sonmi~451’s ascent to sentience at an indeterminate period in Korea’s future, and several places in between. The novel then goes even further into the future, so far in fact that it becomes indistinguishable from the past, and like the reverse zoom in the video above, the novel collapses back in on itself, ending exactly where it began.
“Yay, Old Uns’ Smart mastered sicks, miles, seeds an’ made miracles ord’nary, but it din’t master one thing, nay, a hunger in the hearts o’ humans, yay, a hunger for more.”Cloud Atlas is about human slavery and captivity as it exists in all its forms, at all points in time. Throughout history, humans have enslaved each other on the basis of skin color and racial background, religious beliefs and cultural or ethnic differences. The weak have been enslaved to the strong, the old to the young, and the poor to the well-to-do. This novel goes a step further by exploring the concept of knowledge and how it relates to the socioeconomic hierarchy of the future. Knowledge is all that separates us from savagery, and yet it is our most transient asset. I am probably making this book sound like a course in sociology, though it is anything but. Cloud Atlas is a brilliantly constructed novel delineating the cyclicality of human civilization and it is written by someone who has immediately become one of my favorite authors. In fact, David Mitchell’s only flaw is that he is indecisive. Unable to choose among the various genres of fiction available, he ends up...writing them all! Cloud Atlas is historical fiction, it is a dark comedy, it is a crime thriller, it is science fiction, it is a post-apocalyptic dystopia.
The middle chapter, while the most difficult to read, is easily my favorite. In Sloosha’s Crossin’ an’ Ev’rythin’ After, humanity’s perpetual quest for domination provides the very spark needed to create and sustain civilization. However, this quest is a double-edged sword that becomes its own downfall, since domination is a self-defeating goal, and it is this downfall that ultimately causes civilization to collapse. But despite its bleak forecasts, Cloud Atlas inspires a glimmer of hope for our future, for as insignificant as one person may be, as much as one fathoms his life to have no impact greater than that of a single drop in a limitless ocean, the question is posed: “Yet what is any ocean but a multitude of drops?”
The Milky Way’s Galactic Center
© 2009 Serge Brunier, The Sky of the Earth
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Cloud Atlas.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 19, 2011
– Shelved
April 7, 2012
– Shelved as:
for-kindle
August 14, 2012
– Shelved as:
2012
August 22, 2012
–
35.0%
"...we cross, crisscross, and recross our old tracks like figure skaters..."
August 24, 2012
–
55.0%
"“What if the differences between social strata stem not from genomics or inherent xcellence or even dollars, but merely differences in knowledge? Would this not mean the whole Pyramid is built on shifting sands?”"
August 25, 2012
–
65.0%
"The learnin' mind is the livin' mind, Meronym said, an' any sort o' Smart is truesome Smart, old Smart or new, high Smart or low."
August 28, 2012
–
75.0%
"Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an’ tho’ a cloud’s shape nor hue nor size don’t stay the same, it’s still a cloud an’ so is a soul."
August 29, 2012
–
85.0%
"Ignorance engenders fear; fear engenders hatred; hatred engenders violence; violence engenders further violence until the only "rights," the only law, are whatever is willed by the most powerful."
Started Reading
August 30, 2012
–
95.0%
"“Our will to power, our science, and those very faculties that elevated us from apes, to savages, to modern man, are the same faculties that’ll snuff out Homo sapiens before this century is out!”"
August 30, 2012
– Shelved as:
reviewed
August 30, 2012
– Shelved as:
thrill-me-chill-me-fulfill-me
August 30, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 112 (112 new)
message 1:
by
Tanuj
(new)
Aug 18, 2012 05:42AM
? Wha! You mixed up books here or what!?
reply
|
flag
Oh! I am dense, sorry. You are referring to my 08/17 status update. Haha, yes, I was just playing around about The Savage Detectives. Sorry for being slow!
Okay, so I really actually did tear up with this review. Just beautiful man. I can't wait to reread this book. Thank you.
Oh jeez, guys, wow. Thank you. Really.
Janice, I am skeeeeeeered this movie is going to reduce this novel to sappy sap sapness!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloud...
Janice, I am skeeeeeeered this movie is going to reduce this novel to sappy sap sapness!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloud...
I'm afraid they'll focus too much on the "connected souls" theory, which I really think is just a minor part of the book, but one that could easily be expanded because of the way you can use it to pull moviegoers' heartstrings. But I will keep an open mind!
Yes, 5 stars woohoo! Glad you liked this! And now I want some new Fringe after the Fringe-into in the video.
New favorite author? Awesome. I'm giddy with excitement that you loved this book.
New favorite author? Awesome. I'm giddy with excitement that you loved this book.
Jason wrote: "Oh jeez, guys, wow. Thank you. Really.
Janice, I am skeeeeeeered this movie is going to reduce this novel to sappy sap sapness!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloud..."
....how on earth are they going to film this? Bzuh
Janice, I am skeeeeeeered this movie is going to reduce this novel to sappy sap sapness!
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cloud..."
....how on earth are they going to film this? Bzuh
I like that Sloosha's was your favorite too, it seems everyone has a different favorite which really speaks to how good each story is.
I might periodically stop by to unlike this review just so I can like it over and over again. I'm so glad (but not at all surprised) that you loved this.
Sloosha's Crossin' was my least favorite. maybe. the first one wasn't super great either.
i liked this book a lot, but i'm still not sure what point the nested narratives/continuing souls theme actually serves. it's kind of arbitrary, save for giving a few sections a nice bit of resonance. mostly i think the book is a great way for mitchell to show off his skill at writing in multiple voices and genres.
my biggest takeaway, and this might be just me, was more to do with appreciating the way the book suggests the possibility of immortality in some form, whether through literal reincarnation of the resonance of our lives and deeds. because i think dying sucks not so much because i fear what comes after, but because i won't be around to see what happens later here. like, who will my great-grandchildren be? what will happen to our world? what new technology will develop that will make today seem like the 1800s seem to us? What artistic works yet to be created am i going to miss out on by being dead?
i want to know what happens after, basically. cloud atlas shows us what happens to everyone after, all the way to the end of civilization and back.
there, i finally kind of wrote was i was going to say in the review i never wrote.
i liked this book a lot, but i'm still not sure what point the nested narratives/continuing souls theme actually serves. it's kind of arbitrary, save for giving a few sections a nice bit of resonance. mostly i think the book is a great way for mitchell to show off his skill at writing in multiple voices and genres.
my biggest takeaway, and this might be just me, was more to do with appreciating the way the book suggests the possibility of immortality in some form, whether through literal reincarnation of the resonance of our lives and deeds. because i think dying sucks not so much because i fear what comes after, but because i won't be around to see what happens later here. like, who will my great-grandchildren be? what will happen to our world? what new technology will develop that will make today seem like the 1800s seem to us? What artistic works yet to be created am i going to miss out on by being dead?
i want to know what happens after, basically. cloud atlas shows us what happens to everyone after, all the way to the end of civilization and back.
there, i finally kind of wrote was i was going to say in the review i never wrote.
er, but double post to say good on recognizing how the far-future portion mirrors the distant past portion. it makes me want to complex 3-d model of the narrative.
Joel, maybe you should copy and paste that into a review. You are overdue for one!
I agree with what you say about the range of Mitchell's writing. It is what impressed me most. Each of those vignettes/novellas could have easily been written by a different author.
The whole reincarnated souls thing, though...that was cool but it isn't what drew me in. I think Penkevich mentions in his review that he hits you over the head with it and for me, it was more of a background aspect of the novel. I liked the whole scope of civilization being threatened by the very thing that started it, and I think that's what I liked about the middle chapter so much, because it really bridged everything, and it had some really great Meronym quotes. Not the easiest to read, though...
I agree with what you say about the range of Mitchell's writing. It is what impressed me most. Each of those vignettes/novellas could have easily been written by a different author.
The whole reincarnated souls thing, though...that was cool but it isn't what drew me in. I think Penkevich mentions in his review that he hits you over the head with it and for me, it was more of a background aspect of the novel. I liked the whole scope of civilization being threatened by the very thing that started it, and I think that's what I liked about the middle chapter so much, because it really bridged everything, and it had some really great Meronym quotes. Not the easiest to read, though...
41 votes in one day, More Rays! You're the new Stephen!
How did you do the smart quotes in your review? Don't tell me you have the html memorized for left and right quote marks. (Or did you copy from a word processing program?)
Not that the smart quotes are the only thing that impressed me about this review. The rest of it was completely adequate too.
How did you do the smart quotes in your review? Don't tell me you have the html memorized for left and right quote marks. (Or did you copy from a word processing program?)
Not that the smart quotes are the only thing that impressed me about this review. The rest of it was completely adequate too.
42 now, David, and—as per our "happy/non-happy" discussion—I would not have been "happy" until I got yours. Thank you for making me happy.
Ha! I actually compose reviews using Google Docs, which automatically transcribes quotes into smart quotes. BUT. In fact, I do also happen to know the html codes:
“ (“)
” (”)
Ha! I actually compose reviews using Google Docs, which automatically transcribes quotes into smart quotes. BUT. In fact, I do also happen to know the html codes:
“ (“)
” (”)
Awesome review Jason! I'm glad you liked this book! Also thanks for making me now want to watch Fringe. :)
I have yet to see Fringe myself! I watched the first few episodes with Cristina and then we decided to wait and watch it altogether like we did for LOST. But then it got pushed to the back burner because we got busy with other stuff...like reading. Maybe next year after the final season airs we'll sit down and watch the whole thing.
You definitely should it is a fantastic show. I'm bummed that this season will be the end it feels like it is going to be very different from the other seasons.
Season 4 is out on DVD this week. I plan on renting it from Family Video and banking on them going out of business before I have to return it.
I'm not looking forward to the film, but I may have an irresistible urge to see it anyway.
As for the reincarnated souls aspect, his earlier novel "Ghostwritten" (http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/68...) explores similar ideas, but in a a less gimmicky (single genre) form.
As for the reincarnated souls aspect, his earlier novel "Ghostwritten" (http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/68...) explores similar ideas, but in a a less gimmicky (single genre) form.
Thank you, my little monkey! (I read yours when I finished it and completely disagreed, but also gave you a likey.) :D
I think there is a subset of those who found this gimmicky, and maybe it is, but I loved it anyway. I do agree that the Luisa Rey one is a little pulpy and Dan Brown–ish, but it is the overarching connectedness to the rest of the novel that makes it "ace in the face" in my book.
And the writing! His writing is exceptional.
I think there is a subset of those who found this gimmicky, and maybe it is, but I loved it anyway. I do agree that the Luisa Rey one is a little pulpy and Dan Brown–ish, but it is the overarching connectedness to the rest of the novel that makes it "ace in the face" in my book.
And the writing! His writing is exceptional.
I read a review once, I think it was for Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close—but I don't remember whose review it was—that basically said "gimmicky" is just another word for "I don't like it." Because if you do like it, then you don't find it gimmicky, right?
I don't know if I completely agree with that, but the basic part of that makes sense, I think. I found it not gimmicky at all, though. I think the storytelling style is unique.
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, on the other hand, is gimmicky. :D
I don't know if I completely agree with that, but the basic part of that makes sense, I think. I found it not gimmicky at all, though. I think the storytelling style is unique.
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, on the other hand, is gimmicky. :D
Jason wrote: "I read a review once, I think it was for Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close—but I don't remember whose review it was—that basically said "gimmicky" is just another word for "I don't like it." Beca..."
Good point, I feel 'pretentious' is another word that, like 'gimmicky', is used far to freely in place of where a mere 'it wasn't for me' could have been a far better and more thought provoking phrase. It almost dismisses any further conversation. Not that there aren't gimmicky and pretentious books though. I thought this one surpased gimmick by giving so much meaning to the ideas behind the so-called gimmick. Something like The Unfortunates, on the other hand, were gimmicky, but used the gimmick for a reason. Then yes, there is just books that aren't anything past the gimmick. Extremely Loud no good? I thought the book The People of Paper to be one that relied to heavily on the gimmick and thus became nothing more than that. Wow, I'm tired and rambling, hope this made sense.
Good point, I feel 'pretentious' is another word that, like 'gimmicky', is used far to freely in place of where a mere 'it wasn't for me' could have been a far better and more thought provoking phrase. It almost dismisses any further conversation. Not that there aren't gimmicky and pretentious books though. I thought this one surpased gimmick by giving so much meaning to the ideas behind the so-called gimmick. Something like The Unfortunates, on the other hand, were gimmicky, but used the gimmick for a reason. Then yes, there is just books that aren't anything past the gimmick. Extremely Loud no good? I thought the book The People of Paper to be one that relied to heavily on the gimmick and thus became nothing more than that. Wow, I'm tired and rambling, hope this made sense.
For me, it was a gimmick that paid off; in the hands of a lesser writer, it would merely be one big (or lots of smaller?) gimmick(s).
EL&IC was gimmicky for me, yes definitely, but it has worked well for others, so I wouldn't want you to not read it on my account, Penk.